Not for those with a weak stomach...

What does Paris Hilton have in common with Mother Teresa? Absolutely nothing.

I was horrified to read that an Indian director by the name of T. Rajeevnath was approaching Paris Hilton (star of House of Wax, the Simple Life, and many other unspeakably horrific and infamous films) to portray Blessed Teresa of Calcutta. I am certain the director is seeking additional publicity by potentially (mis)casting someone famed for her indulgence to play a woman millions find to be the exemplar of selflessness in our world today. (While Paris Hilton may well be a closeted humanitarian and positive role model, her public image is very much the opposite.)

Perhaps I am mistaken, but it would seem Mother Teresa's enormous popularity would fill the seats of many movie theatres if only the director had the courage to respectfully and accurately depict her life's events. Fewer people have ever been more admired and adored than Mother Teresa, and though her fans might not incite angry protests, they could target the entertainment industry where it is the most injurious- at the box office. I am willing to bet that the number of potential movie viewers offended by such a decision would far outnumber those drawn to the film because of the casting choice.

Is the opinion of movie viewers so low that directors feel compelled to make these types of decisions? Do our movie/television choices send a message that thoughtful and moving works of art are no longer welcome? I don't really keep up with the entertainment industry and I'm sure there are many examples of work produced to cater to such crummy tastes, but REALLY?

My apologies for the rant - I just felt compelled to broadcast my disgust to the world and/or all 3 of you reading. :)